The Neurology of Female Friendship

By Alissa Sofia Maria Bocance

The special significance of female relationship dynamics as an essential source of social and emotional well-being is increasingly recognized. In recent years, however, the neurobiological mechanisms that guide these relationships have actively  increased attention. This article aims to trace the evolutionary step from the neurology of female friendships to those of feminist networks while navigating through the neurobiological processes behind emotional bonding and empathy to empower collective processes. In studying female friendship and feminist networks, we have a chance to synergize the biological and social perspectives and create more knowledge concerning the social brain, especially about how women's collective activities are neurologically and socially constructed toward empowerment through such relationships.

The Neurology of Friendship: Social Connectivity and Empathy

Neuroscientific research about friendship suggests that the brain is wired for social connections, particularly through emotional engagement and empathic connections. In the case of female friendships, there tends to be more emotional intimacy and more empathy between friends. Neuroimaging studies indicate that these kinds of social bonds activate brain regions, including the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), and insula - these are all highly relevant to processes related to empathy, emotional regulation, and perspective-taking. Such brain regions would respond to the emotional states of the others, and provide social support for one another to create a strong interdependent relationship.

Such neural mechanisms in female friendships are evidenced by increased experience sharing and emotional understanding. ACC is known to be involved in the processing of social and emotional pain, and studies have shown that observing a friend in distress ignites these same brain regions as if one is experiencing pain. This common phenomenon enlarges such emotional understanding and serves to build emotional support, which remains a major feature of the close female friendship. Thus, these neural paths would indicate that friendship is much more than a social or cultural phenomenon; it is a biological phenomenon within the brain.

Empathy, Mirror Neurons

Empathy, the ability to understand and share another person's feelings, is vital in female friendships. The empathic connection is partly mediated through the mirror neuron system of the brain, which allows women to sense and almost imitate the emotions of others. Interaction with a close friend or in feminist networks activates the mirror neuron systems in women as they engage in shared emotional experiences that synchronize their emotional worlds as a way to enhance their bonding.

In the domain of feminist networks, empathy is at the center of solidarity. Feminist movements usually stand on an equal sense of injustice or motivation for empowerment, and women can thereby empathize with one another's struggles which becomes a prerequisite for unity. Upon exposure to stories of injustice or inequality, the vmPFC becomes particularly active in women alongside the processing of moral emotions like empathy and guilt. The neural responses to collective experiences define the sense of moral responsibility motivating the groups to act in favor of the common cause.

Moreover, it is found that the empathic reaction also stimulates the release of oxytocin known popularly as the "bonding hormone." Oxytocin is responsible for the strengthening of social bonds and the promotion of trust and cooperation in feminist networks. This means that whenever women engage in supportive acts in the form of advocacy and emotional support for one another, the resulting oxytocin release consolidates the neural circuits that are inclined toward cooperation and community building. Thus, the hormonal control of empathy and social bonding boosts the collective empowerment of feminist networks, providing a neurobiological framework for solidarity on which social movements may flourish.

Neuroplasticity: The Impact of Feminist Networks on the Brain

Neuroplasticity, the brain's ability to alter and reconfigure its way of doing things in response to different experiences, is another important facet in explaining how neurology understands female friendship and feminist networks. Studies have demonstrated that interaction and social group dynamics can, over time, affect how the brain processes emotional stimuli, reacts to social stimuli, and, more broadly, links to the community.

For example, continuously engaging in feminist activism or with social networks for collective causes might contribute to greater social cognition and emotional regulation in women. These same women may demonstrate brain activity in areas important for social interaction, such as the medial prefrontal cortex and temporoparietal junction (TPJ). It serves as a basis for the processing of social information, negotiation of the complexity concerning social dynamics, and empathizing with the experiences of others. So, as women are involved in feminist networks and, of course, the engagement with collective causes, attending in these repeated social environments strengthens the rewiring of neural circuits associated with empathy, emotional intelligence, and social cohesion.

On the other hand, neuroplasticity is also the explanation needed to understand how groups of feminists may promote individual strength and build collective identity. When women find themselves in solidarity with feminist groups, they tend to feel empowered and valued as individuals. This change is capable of restructuring brain areas relating to self-concept, such as the medial prefrontal cortex, to allow for a stronger, more resilient sense of identity. In that sense, feminist networks facilitate social change, and defining individual empowerment for women enhances their social and neurological ecosystem.

The Social Brain: A Feminist Perspective

Neurofeminist perspectives especially challenge the common assumptions of neuroscience about the brain being 'sexed'. They contend that gender is socially constructed and more dependent on environmental and experiential factors than on genetics. For instance, by specifically examining how female friendships and feminist networks could influence the brain, neurofeminism attempts to debunk the grand myth that women have "social brains" predisposed to passive, underprivileged scenarios. Therefore, neurofeminism emphasizes how female social behavior is active, socially engaged, and power-driven rather than socially conditioned.

In addition to women's networks, such networks between individuals demonstrate the presence of collective agency. The vast and different social dynamics created within them stimulate this feeling of purpose, collective identity, and empowerment, restructuring the quality of women's associations as a collective unit and modifying how they relate to the broader society. These mechanisms also help women understand the neurological underpinning of their friendships and feminist networks while indicating the strength of sociality in the brain, showing that women's social brains work actively but are also significantly sensitized to the goals and desires of the collective.

Conclusion: The Neurobiology of Female Empowerment

The biology of neurology involves female friendships and feminist networks that weave tightly into a rich tapestry of interconnection among biology, behavior, and collective empowerment. Also, for all female friendships, they trigger the neurobiological systems that increase empathy, emotional regulation, and social bonding while feminist networks activate those same neural pathways to invigorate solidarity, social change, and empowerment. Thus, gaining knowledge about such neuroscience would entail an understanding of the influence such connections could create, whether at the personal or the collective level, regarding action. Feminist neuroscience is a poster for reimagining these types of bonds - not only cultural constructs, but neurologically embedded mechanisms that shape ways women's experiences on the use of their power envisage empowerment.

Such encompasses the neurologies of female friendship and feminist networks. What necessarily stands here on the interlacing parts of biology, social activities, and empowerment is the definite activation of neurobiological systems by female friendships for a heightened capacity for empathy, better emotional self-regulation, and an improvement in social bonding such as those that feminist networks would use through the same neural pathways for solidarity and so on for changes and empowerment. Knowing this neuroscience, you learn about such relationships to understand better how their strong action at the individual or the group level might affect social connections in the context of collective action. Feminist neuroscience thereby becomes the ideal territory for rethinking these social bonds as not only cultural constructs but indeed also neurologically embedded mechanisms.

References

1. Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A., & Updegraff, J. A. (2000). "Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight." Psychological Review, 107(3), 411-429.

2. Inagaki, T. K., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2012). "Neural correlates of giving support to a loved one." Psychosomatic Medicine, 74(1), 3-7.

3. Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). "The functional architecture of human empathy." Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71-100.

4. Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004). "Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain." Science, 303(5661), 1157-1162.

5. Güroğlu, B., van den Bos, W., & Crone, E. A. (2014). "Sharing and giving across adolescence: An experimental study examining the development of prosocial behavior." Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 291.

6. Carter, C. S. (2014). "Oxytocin pathways and the evolution of human behavior." Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 17-39.

7. Uvnäs-Moberg, K., Handlin, L., & Petersson, M. (2015). "Self-soothing behaviors with particular reference to oxytocin release induced by non-noxious sensory stimulation." Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1529.

8. Decety, J., & Svetlova, M. (2012). "Putting together phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives on empathy." Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(1), 1-24.

9. Panksepp, J., & Panksepp, J. B. (2013). "Toward a cross-species understanding of empathy." Trends in Neurosciences, 36(8), 489-496.

10. Hrdy, S. B. (2009). Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding. Harvard University Press.

11. Taylor, S. E. (2006). "Tend and befriend: Biobehavioral bases of affiliation under stress." Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 273-277.

12. Barrett, L. F., & Satpute, A. B. (2013). "Large-scale brain networks in affective and social neuroscience: Towards an integrative functional architecture of the brain." Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23(3), 361-372.

13. Dunbar, R. I. M. (2018). "The anatomy of friendship." Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 32-51.

14. Gordon, I., & Feldman, R. (2018). "The developmental psychobiology of human parent-infant bonding." Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 54, 1-48.

15. Schurz, M., Radua, J., Aichhorn, M., Richlan, F., & Perner, J. (2014). "Fractionating theory of mind: A meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies." Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 42, 9-34.

16. Lamm, C., Decety, J., & Singer, T. (2011). "Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain." NeuroImage, 54(3), 2492-2502.

17. Meyer, M. L., Masten, C. L., Ma, Y., Wang, C., Shi, Z., Eisenberger, N. I., & Han, S. (2013). "Empathy for the social suffering of friends and strangers recruits distinct patterns of brain activation." Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(4), 446-454.

18. Wager, T. D., & Atlas, L. Y. (2015). "The neuroscience of placebo effects: Connecting context, learning and health." Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(7), 403-418.

19. Zaki, J., & Ochsner, K. N. (2012). "The neuroscience of empathy: Progress, pitfalls and promise." Nature Neuroscience, 15(5), 675-680.

20. Christov-Moore, L., Simpson, E. A., Coudé, G., Grigaityte, K., Iacoboni, M., & Ferrari, P. F. (2014). "Empathy: Gender effects in brain and behavior." Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 46, 604-627.

21. Feldman, R. (2012). "Oxytocin and social affiliation in humans." Hormones and Behavior, 61(3), 380-391.

22. Gonzaga, G. C., Turner, R. A., Keltner, D., Campos, B., & Altemus, M. (2006). "Romantic love and sexual desire in close relationships." Emotion, 6(2), 163-179.

23. Iacoboni, M. (2009). "Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons." Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 653-670.